A Jewish Reading of 1 Corinthians 11:1-16

Because of the Angels: Headship, Glory, and the Woman’s Covering in Light of Genesis 3

1Be ye followers of me, even as I also am of Christ. 2Now I praise you, brethren, that ye remember me in all things, and keep the ordinances, as I delivered them to you. 3But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God. 4Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered, dishonoureth his head. 5But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven. 6For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered. 7For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man. 8For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man. 9Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man. 10For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the angels. 11Nevertheless neither is the man without the woman, neither the woman without the man, in the Lord. 12For as the woman is of the man, even so is the man also by the woman; but all things of God. 13Judge in thisselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered? 14Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him? 15But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering. 16But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the Ekklesiae of God.

Introduction: Not about Modesty, But Glory

The apostle Paul’s directive in 1 Corinthians 11:10 has baffled many interpreters: “because of the angels.” Traditional explanations often appeal to Greco-Roman decorum, angelic witnesses in worship, or liturgical modesty. However, these approaches read foreign assumptions into the text. This article presents an alternative rooted in Torah-based theology, Genesis typology, and Jewish thought on the order of creation and the angelic hierarchy.

As we approach an examination of these passages concerning the role, place, and function of women in the Messianic Ekklessia that gathered in the Synagogues and the extensions of the synagogues that met in the homes of the Messianic believers, both Jews and proselytes, we want to pursue the background of the text and of Paul. I will use Paul, his Roman name, and Sha’ul or Saul, his Hebrew name, interchangeably.

Sha’ul’s (Paul’s) background.

 How Sha’ul’s Background Influenced the Early Ekklesia

Sha’ul was not just a Jew; he was a Pharisee of Pharisees, a student of the great rabbi Gamaliel in Jerusalem (Acts 22:3, Philippians 3:5). This is the single most important key to understanding him. His entire worldview was that of a 1st-century rabbi trained in sophisticated rabbinic interpretation (midrash).

1.  A Jewish Messiah for a Jewish World: Sha’ul never saw himself as founding a new religion. He saw Yeshua (Jesus) as the fulfillment of every promise made to Avraham, Yitzhak, and Ya’akov (Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob). His mission was to proclaim the Jewish Messiah to the Gentile world. This is why his arguments are saturated with the Tanakh (Old Testament). His doctrine of justification by faith, for example, is a deep midrash on Avraham’s faith in Genesis 15:6.

2.  The Bridge Between Two Worlds: Sha’ul’s unique calling was to be the apostle to the Gentiles while remaining a Torah-observant Jew (see Acts 21:20-26). This positioned him perfectly to navigate the Ekklesia’s first great crisis: must Gentiles become Jews (through circumcision) to follow the Jewish Messiah? The Jerusalem Council in Acts 15 was a direct result of Sha’ul’s ministry and his Pharisaical ability to argue from Scripture. His insight that faith in Messiah, not ethnic identity or law-keeping as a Jew, was the sole requirement for salvation, preserved the gospel for the entire world.

3.  Rabbinic Teaching Style: His letters are not systematic theological textbooks. They are occasional letters—written to address specific problems in specific congregations. A rabbi addresses the situation in front of him. This is crucial for understanding the passages on women. He wasn’t writing a universal Ekklesia constitution; he was applying eternal gospel principles to local, first-century cultural crises within the assemblies to whom he was writing in their local settings.

Between Two Worlds: Paul, the Corinthian Ekklesia, and the Role of Women

Paul’s Dual Identity: Pharisee and Roman Citizen

To properly interpret Paul’s instructions in 1 Corinthians 11, we must first appreciate his unique identity. Paul was:

• A Pharisaic Jew, trained under Gamaliel (Acts 22:3), thoroughly steeped in the Torah, Jewish law, and synagogue life.
• A Roman citizen (Acts 22:25–28), fully aware of the customs, legal structures, and societal expectations of the Greco-Roman world.

This dual identity positioned Paul to serve as a bridge between the Jewish covenantal community and the newly grafted-in Gentile believers. His mission (Galatians 2:8–9) was to bring the nations into covenant faithfulness—not through assimilation, but through ethical and spiritual alignment with Israel’s God.

---

The Gentile Challenge: Leaving the Imperial Cult, Entering the Synagogue

The Gentiles Paul addressed in Corinth were not converting from irreligion—they were leaving the Roman Imperial Cult and a host of pagan mystery religions rooted in Greco-Roman social order and ritual behavior.

This shift was profound. They were transitioning from:

• Idolatrous worship and gender-fluid priesthoods
• A culture where women held ritual and spiritual authority
• Public religious performances with female oracles, priestesses, and prophetesses

…into an assembly modeled on the synagogue, where the Torah, communal modesty, and gendered roles in worship were part of the structure. This raised significant tensions—particularly for Gentile women, who came from cultures where women were not only visible but dominant in many religious spheres.

---

Paul’s Instruction in Context: The Challenge of Cultural Transposition

Paul’s instructions in 1 Corinthians 11:2–16 regarding head coverings, honor, and public prayer must be read within this cultural collision.

He was not correcting Jewish women who were already accustomed to synagogue protocol, but Gentile women, whose former cultural experiences may have been drawn from one or more of the following:

---

Greco-Roman Contexts Where Women Held Authority Over Men

1. Religious Leadership Roles

• Vestal Virgins (Rome): Held sacred duties and legal privileges, even over men.
• Priestesses of Goddesses: In Greece, women served as leaders of cults dedicated to Artemis, Demeter, Athena, Hera, and others.
• Oracles: The Pythia of Delphi was a female mouthpiece of Apollo, whose words guided emperors and kings.

2. Political Power and Imperial Women

• Empresses like Livia or Agrippina exercised immense political influence.
• Some royal women were deified posthumously and worshiped.
• Wealthy women sponsored temples, cities, and public buildings—sometimes titled as civic magistrates.

3. Philosophical and Intellectual Circles

• Women like Hypatia of Alexandria and Diotima (in Plato’s dialogues) were viewed as intellectual authorities, even over men.

4. Mystery Religions

• Women were prominent in the Dionysian cult, Isis worship, and Cybele rites—frequently acting as leaders, initiates, and prophetic voices.

5. Household Authority

• Matronae (Roman matrons) could:
  • Run large estates
  • Serve as patrons of clients
  • Arrange marriages and business alliances

6. Mythological Archetypes

• Goddesses like Athena, Artemis, Isis, and Hera served as cultural legitimizers for real-world female power.

---

Summary Table: Women’s Authority in Greco-Roman Society

Sphere	Role of Women	Authority Over Men?
Religious Priesthood	Vestals, Oracles, Cult Priestesses	✅ Yes
Imperial Politics	Empresses, royal patronage, political advisors	✅ Yes (often indirect)
Public Benefaction	Patrons of temples, cities, civic institutions	⚠️ Sometimes
Intellectual Leadership	Philosophers, educators, mystics	✅ Yes (in intellectual domain)
Mystery Religions	Initiators, prophetesses, ritual leaders	✅ Yes (ritual domain)
Household / Domestic Power	Estate managers, marriage brokers, legal influencers	✅ Yes (within the domus)

---

Paul’s Response in Light of Jewish Assembly Protocol

In this light, Paul’s instructions on head coverings, propriety, and honor (kavod) in public worship were not arbitrary or misogynistic. Rather, they reflect a return to the order and norms of the synagogue, where:

• Men and women had distinct, honorable roles.
• Worship was not performative, eroticized, or ecstatic as in pagan rituals.
• Gender distinctions in symbolic acts of submission (e.g., head coverings) reflected respect, not inequality.

Paul’s argument in 1 Corinthians 11 is best read not through the lens of modern egalitarian debates, but as a boundary-setting clarification for Gentiles entering Jewish sacred space—especially for women who were previously used to exercising ritual power and spiritual dominance in pagan rites.

---

Conclusion: A Jewish Reading Clarifies the Conflict

Paul is not silencing women. He is reorienting Gentile women into a new sacred order, shaped by Jewish covenantal worship, not Greco-Roman customs. His background as a Torah-observant Pharisee, and his mission to bring Gentiles into Israel’s hope, required him to address behavioral, ritual, and symbolic issues that might otherwise confuse or disrupt the assembly of God.

WOMEN IN THE EKKLESIA – Part 2